MEKANISME PELELNAGAN BARANG AGUNAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM EKONOMI ISLAM

STUDI KASUS SALINAN PUTUSAN1316/PD.G/2016/PA.TMK. DI PENGADILAN AGAMA TASIKMALAYA JAWA BARAT

  • Asep Ridwan Hotoya Universitas Islam As-Syafi’iyah Jakarta
  • Bobi Saputra Pengadilan Agama Kota Tasikmalaya
  • Us-Us Surya Nopendi IAI Latifah Mubarokiyah Suryalaya
Keywords: Defendant filed, lawsuit of resistance, Tasikmalaya

Abstract

That the Defendant filed a lawsuit of resistance to the City of Tasikmalaya Religious Court against Defendant I and Defendant II (The Defendants) through civil liability against the Law as stipulated in Article 1365 jo. Article 1366 jo. Article 1367 Civil Code jo. The data used are primary data, namely data obtained through interviews with respondents and secondary data, namely data obtained from library materials. With the subject of the study consisted of respondents and resource persons. Analysis of the data used is qualitative analysis with the intention not only to reveal the truth but to understand the truth. According to the law, as stipulated in the provisions of Article 20 UUHT, the procedure for executing objects of mortgages can only be carried out in 3 (three) ways, namely: (1) Execution of parate (direct execution) (2) Execution with judge's help (3) Execution of sales in under the hand Law No. 50/2009 changes to the second Law No.7 / 1989 concerning the Religious Courts, in Article 54 it requires that the rema of the event applies in the future. Religious justice is the same as the rema of the applicable program in the environment. General justice, except for things that have been specifically regulated in the Act. (1) Law No.49 / 2009 concerning General Courts. (2) Impres No.1 / 1991 Compilation of Islamic Law. (3) Circular of the Repoblik Indonesia Supreme Court. (4) Supreme Court jurisprudence, namely systematic collection of Supreme Court decisions and Appellate Court Decisions followed by other judges in making decisions on the same issue. In the deliberations the noble judges stated that they suspended the auction of execution on the object of mortgage rights in the form of: A piece of land and buildings attached to it, No. SHM. 1612 / Cipedes a.n. Nurlela, a land area of 194 m² and a building area of 125 m², located on Jalan Bojong Tengah No.5, Cipedes Village, Cipedes District, Tasikmalaya City and charged to Pelawan, Defendant I and Defendant II to pay court fees of Rp. 606,000 (Six hundred and six thousand rupiahs).

References

Jamaludin, 2018. Kapita Selekta Tasawuf, Hukum, & Ekonomi Syariah, Tasikmalaya : Latifah.
Sahal Mahfudh, 2011. Solusi Problematika Aktual Hukum Islam, Keputusan Muktamar, Munas, dan Konbes,Surabaya: Khalista.
Bobi Saputra, 2017. Laporan PPK, Tasikmalaya, Panwascam Pagerageung.
Arsif Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya, 2016. Putusan 1316/Pdt. G/2016/PA.Tmk.
Nita Triana, 2018. Eksekusi Hak Tangungan Pada Perbankan Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Purbalingga.
Beni Pamujihharto: Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan di Pengadilan Negeri. Thesis
Sumardi Suryabrata, 1998. Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiono, 2017. metode penelitian kombinasi, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, 2013. Metode penelitian Manajemen, Yogyakarta;Alfabeta.
Wawan, 2015. Desain Penelitian Kualitatif, Tasikmalaya, latifah press.
Munawir, 1999. Peradilan Agama dan kompilasi Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta.
Sulaikin Lubis, 2005. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta.
Gemala Dewi, 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana.
A. Mukti Arto, 1996. Praktik Perkara Perdata Pada Peradilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Qodri, Muh. Nanang. 2007. Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Harta Bersama di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta (Studi terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama
Abdul Halim, 2000. Peradilan Agama dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2007. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Dadan Muttaqien, 1999. Peradilan Agama dan kompilasi Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta.
Pasal 130 ayat (2) HIR/Pasal 154 ayat (2)
Pasal 224 HIR/Pasal 258
Pasal 195 ayat (1) HIR/Pasal 206ayat (1)
Pasal 90 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU No. 7 (Tahun 1989).
Pasal 66-72 UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1989
Udang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengadilan Agama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan
Pasal 1 ayat (1) UU Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan.
Pasal 12 UU Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan.
Pasal 13 UU Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan.
Pasal 6 UU Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan.
Published
2018-06-20
How to Cite
Hotoya, A., Saputra, B., & Surya Nopendi, U.-U. (2018). MEKANISME PELELNAGAN BARANG AGUNAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM EKONOMI ISLAM. MUTAWASITH, 1(1), 31-45. Retrieved from http://jurnal.iailm.ac.id/index.php/mutawasith/article/view/21
Section
Articles